If everyone hates censorship so much, why do those “censorship-free” alternative social media sites always fail?

Nazis.

“Censorship-free” social media sites quickly become Nazi bars where people exchange child porn. Normal human beings don’t hang out in Nazi bars with pedophiles.

Child pornographers.

Have anyone had an relationship of any kind with a spirit or demon, such as a succubus? If so, how was it?

I hate censorship. That is, I think the government has no place controlling what people say, read, express, or create, except insofar as is necessary to prevent things like terroristic threats, dissemination of classified information, fraud, false advertising, and so on.

We don’t have to guess. We know.

Are you going to stay on a social media site that’s all photos of babies being raped, Nazis posting graphic descriptions of finishing what Hitler started, and plans for school shootings?

What does Jesus mean in Revelation 3:3 when He states, "Wake up! Strengthen what remains and is about to die, for I have found your deeds unfinished in the sight of my God?"

Why do “censorship-free” social media networks always fail? Well, let’s see. Sit down and think. Think really, really hard.

So.

Who is the #2 user of completely free digital communications networks that let you say absolutely anything? Who else wants that?

Why are liberals so bad at grasping alternative facts? For example, if something doesn’t happen the exact same way Trump described it, liberals dismiss it as false; while conservatives are able to fully understand the underlying principle.

The #3 user? Terrorists. 8kun was used to plan 3 different school shootings in a 6-month period.

The #1 problem people who make and consume child pornography have is connecting the producers with the buyers. Any “censorship-free” network quickly gets overrun with child porn. Classic example: 8kun.

Because you’re confusing two different things.

Why is Jack Smith arguing that presidents should not have full immunities as Trump is requesting?

Who is the #1 user of completely free digital communications networks that let you say absolutely anything? Who most wants that?

If I let you borrow my bike for free, I have the right to tell you you can’t do certain things with it, and I have the right to take it back. Why? Because it’s my property, not yours.

You have the right to say what you want. You do not have the right to use other people’s stuff for free.

Why is my elder sister so mean?

Now, say you’re an ordinary person. You don’t like child porn. You’re not a Nazi. You don’t want to shoot up a school or blow up the White House.

That has nothing to do with social media.

If i let you use my computer network for free, I have the right to tell you you can’t do certain things with it, and I have the right to kick you off. Why? Because it’s my property, not yours.

Why are perceived or real slights interpreted as rejections and reality by pwBPD?